What is better Microsoft Azure Cost Management or VobeSoft? You can use our scoring system to help you get a general idea which Cloud Management Software product is better for your business. For overall product quality, Microsoft Azure Cost Management attained 8.5 points, while VobeSoft gained 8.0 points. Meanwhile, for user satisfaction, Microsoft Azure Cost Management scored 95%, while VobeSoft scored 100%.
Details about their unique elements, tools, supported platforms, customer support, and more are available below to help you get a more precise comparison. Keep in mind to purchase only the functions that you need so as not to waste money for features that are unnecessary.
In the event you have to quickly find the more reliable Cloud Management Software according to our experts we suggest you take a look at one of these services: IBM Cloud Orchestrator, Apache CloudStack, monday.com.
Microsoft Azure Cost Management for Microsoft Azure is free for the standard features and thus has no enterprise pricing while the premium capabilities remain free only through June 2018. Enterprise pricing will become available later. Meanwhile, Microsoft Azure Cost Management has an enterprise pricing for the standard and premium capabilities for Amazon Web Service and Google Cloud.
You can interface Microsoft Azure Cost Management with Microsoft Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud to retrieve cloud spend data.
Languages Supported
English
Chinese
German
Hindi
Japanese
Spanish
French
Russian
Italian
Dutch
Portugese
Polish
Turkish
Swedish
Arabic
Prominent Clients
University of Lincoln, Mainstream Technologies, Infosys
Available Devices
Windows
Linux
Android
iPhone/iPad
Mac
Web-based
Windows Mobile
Company Size
Small Business
Large Enterprises
Medium Business
Freelancers
Available Support
email
phone
live support
training
tickets
General Info
A cloud spend monitoring application that empowers organizations to mitigate their costs for the Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, and Google Cloud platforms.
VobeSoft has several plans for you to choose from, including an enterprise pricing plan which includes custom RTO, RPO, OLA, & SLA, custom SSO, integration permission, and dedicated customer support. Here are the details:
Free – €0/month
1 user
500 items
5GB storage
Web forms
Knowledge base
Basic – €22/users/month (€20 if billed annually)
5 users
All features in Free Plan, Plus:
10,000 items
50 GB storage
Visual workflows
Unlimited file templates
Custom alerts
Standard – €44/users/month (€40 if billed annually)
Every time you select a product that you believe will work best for your team you shouldn’t just limit yourself to what professionals have to say about it. In many cases individual experience with the app may change, depending on your own preferences and requirements. That’s why in our reviews we also provide our User Satisfaction Rating for each app to give you a quick overview of how actual users of Microsoft Azure Cost Management and VobeSoft rate their contact with the software. Our algorithm is built around detailed analysis of product appearances on other websites, social networks and blogs, so you will obtain a comprehensive and credible landscape of what other clients think about every service. In this case Microsoft Azure Cost Management got a total satisfaction rating at 95% while for VobeSoft 100% of people express they had an enjoyable experience with it.
Page last modified
Why is FinancesOnline free?
FinancesOnline is available for free for all business professionals interested in an efficient way to find top-notch SaaS solutions. We are able to keep our service free of charge thanks to cooperation with some of the vendors, who are willing to pay us for traffic and sales opportunities provided by our website. Please note, that FinancesOnline lists all vendors, we’re not limited only to the ones that pay us, and all software providers have an equal opportunity to get featured in our rankings and comparisons, win awards, gather user reviews, all in our effort to give you reliable advice that will enable you to make well-informed purchase decisions.
