What is better Klimb or Submittable? To ensure that you get the most efficient and productive Applicant Tracking Systems for your business, you need to compare products available on the market. For instance, here it is possible to match Klimb’s overall score of 8.0 against Submittable’s score of 9.5. You can also evaluate their general user satisfaction: Klimb (100%) vs. Submittable (100%).
Furthermore, you can review their pros and cons feature by feature, including their contract conditions and pricing. By comparing products you are more likely to select the right software for your company. It’s clear you should know your particular requirements to realize which software meets those needs.
As of now, the leading solutions in our Applicant Tracking Systems category are: BambooHR, Submittable, SmartRecruiters.
Submittable offers four pricing plans. In case you want to learn more about what the product has to offer before committing to a particular subscription, the vendor also offers a free 14-day free trial. Plans start at $10,000 annually.
Starter Subscription – starts at $10,000
Custom team seats and application limits
Unlimited projects
Online form builder and application portal
Eligibility screening
Multi-round review tools
Standard reporting
Support for your team and applicants
Professional Subscription – by quote
Everything in Starter, plus unlock enhanced features including:
Real-time applicant collaboration
Advanced reporting and impact reporting
Automated review
Integrations, API, and SSO
Preferred support and implementation options
Fraud prevention
Enterprise Subscription – by quote
Everything in Starter and Pro, plus unlock enhanced services and features including:
Funds distribution
Custom branding
Project management and professional services
Premium support and implementation
CSR – starts at $10,000 or with a Professional Subscription
Submittable is an open API system that you can easily connect to a variety of third-party applications. It also offers hundreds of integrations including:
Zapier
QuickBooks
Salesforce
Google Analytics
Google Sheets
Languages Supported
English
Chinese
German
Hindi
Japanese
Spanish
French
Russian
Italian
Dutch
Portugese
Polish
Turkish
Swedish
Arabic
Prominent Clients
TinHouse, NBC, Ball State University
Available Devices
Windows
Linux
Android
iPhone/iPad
Mac
Web-based
Windows Mobile
Company Size
Small Business
Large Enterprises
Medium Business
Freelancers
Available Support
email
phone
live support
training
tickets
General Info
An all-in-one application management solution that helps teams manage the application and review process. It offers features ranging from multichannel job posting and application form creation to review management and autoscoring. Moreover, the platform is mobile-ready to give you the flexibility you need.
No Applicant Tracking Systems will be able to solve all the needs of a business. Even though key features of Klimb and Submittable are important you should also thoroughly study the integrations supported by each software. Very often you will already be working with other types of SaaS software in your company and it’s much wiser to select products that integrate well with each other. If you do that you will be able to be certain of an effortless exchange of data between your teams and apps, which can considerably reduce time devoted to migrating between one app and the other.
Page last modified
Why is FinancesOnline free?
FinancesOnline is available for free for all business professionals interested in an efficient way to find top-notch SaaS solutions. We are able to keep our service free of charge thanks to cooperation with some of the vendors, who are willing to pay us for traffic and sales opportunities provided by our website. Please note, that FinancesOnline lists all vendors, we’re not limited only to the ones that pay us, and all software providers have an equal opportunity to get featured in our rankings and comparisons, win awards, gather user reviews, all in our effort to give you reliable advice that will enable you to make well-informed purchase decisions.
