What is better StoryXpress or Wax? A good way to find the appropriate Video Editing Software product for your business is to compare the solutions against each other. Here you can compare StoryXpress and Wax and see their functions compared in detail to help you pick which one is the better product.
Similarly, you can compare their overall ratings, such as: overall score (StoryXpress: 8.8 vs. Wax: 7.8) and user satisfaction (StoryXpress: 92% vs. Wax: 96%). Analyze their distinctive features and similarities and discover which one outperforms the other. Likewise, imagine your company tomorrow; will your business outgrow the app in the next couple of years?
Users who are pressed for time or would like to get a Video Editing Software recommendation from our experts might want to take a look at these top choices for the current year: Filmora, Adobe Premiere Pro, Final Cut Pro.
StoryXpress is available for both personal and team use. It includes all the core features, plus advanced functionalities based on your needs. It also comes with add-ons for more features. All paid packages are available in monthly and yearly discounted plans
Free (for individuals)
Ideal for quick recording and sharing of video content
Standard features:
Upload and download
Record
Share
View notifications
Password protection
Social integrations
Email integrations
Lite (for individuals) – $8/month or $80/year
Ideal for creating, recording, and sharing video content
All features in the Free plan
Unlimited access
Video editing:
Crop
Trimming
Blur
Custom video thumbnail
Thumbnail A/B testing
Playlists
Pro (for teams) – $15/user/month or $150/user/year
Ideal for internal teams and marketing campaigns
All features in Lite plan
Collaboration tools
Video editing:
Intro
Outro
Basic call-to-action elements
Buttons
Banners
Basic analytics
Integrated team communications
Custom branding
Plus (for teams) – $15/user/month or $150/user/year
A complete business solution to develop, share, analyze, and track videos
StoryExpress seamlessly works with different systems and platforms used in sales, customer success, human resources, and marketing. It aims to be a one-stop-shop for all creative video production from internal communications to lead generation. It integrates easily with apps such as:
YouTube
MailChimp
Slack
Languages Supported
English
Chinese
German
Hindi
Japanese
Spanish
French
Russian
Italian
Dutch
Portugese
Polish
Turkish
Swedish
Arabic
Prominent Clients
Target, Best Buy, Johnson & Johnson
Available Devices
Windows
Linux
Android
iPhone/iPad
Mac
Web-based
Windows Mobile
Company Size
Small Business
Large Enterprises
Medium Business
Freelancers
Available Support
email
phone
live support
training
tickets
General Info
A video development, customization, analytics, and hosting platform that helps businesses communicate efficiently with their teams, stakeholders, and clients. With this, you can not only streamline how you work, but you can also close deals faster.
All the data, information and statistics that we presented in this comparison were gathered from official vendor sites, advertising resources available online, actual experience from real clients as well as our individual everyday use of each app by an expert. We put a lot of effort to thoroughly study every app, so we not only examine it on our own, but we also correlate our results with views of other users from the SaaS community.
Page last modified
Why is FinancesOnline free?
FinancesOnline is available for free for all business professionals interested in an efficient way to find top-notch SaaS solutions. We are able to keep our service free of charge thanks to cooperation with some of the vendors, who are willing to pay us for traffic and sales opportunities provided by our website. Please note, that FinancesOnline lists all vendors, we’re not limited only to the ones that pay us, and all software providers have an equal opportunity to get featured in our rankings and comparisons, win awards, gather user reviews, all in our effort to give you reliable advice that will enable you to make well-informed purchase decisions.
