What is better Lineup or Fitbot? If you’re experiencing a tough time deciding on the best Learning Management Systems (LMS) product for your circumstances, we suggest that you compare the available software and find out which one offers more benefits. For example, here you can examine Lineup (overall score: 8.0; user rating: 100%) vs. Fitbot (overall score: 7.9; user rating: 100%) for their overall performance.
You can even see which one provides more tools that you need or which has better pricing plans for your current budget. Using a clear table to match their features will significantly boost the possibility of finding the appropriate product for your company. Pay attention to other areas of the software like if it’s easy to use, adaptability, scalability, and pricing plans.
We know that not all businesses have the time to test dozens of different solutions, so we came up with a list of recommendations that you may find useful. Our top selections for the Talent Management System category are: ClearCompany, PeopleAdmin, Zoho Recruit.
Lineup provides three plans for users to choose from, including an enterprise pricing plan designed for organizations that have complex needs. Here are the details of each plan:
Standard – $399/month
For medium-sized organizations
10 Admins
25 Active teams
Unlimited team members
1,000 Active users
2 Application forms
3 Survey templates
20 Custom data points
10 Team metadata properties
5 Team experience data fields
Profile data export
Bulk CSV upload
Document upload
Team member performance evaluations
Integrations
Email tracking
Email branding
Team emails
Customized emails
Knowledge center
Support via email
2-hours Onboarding
Pro – $899/month
For large-sized organizations
20 Admins
50 Active teams
Unlimited team members
2,500 Active users
7 Application forms
7 Survey templates
Unlimited Custom data points
UnlimitedTeam metadata properties
10 Team experience data fields
All Platform & Communication features in Standard Plan
Fitbot offers three SMB pricing plans for users to choose from. All the plans can be availed on a monthly subscription basis, and the enterprise pricing varies depending on the number of client you wish to manage. Give the details a look, and select the best plan for your business:
Fitbot supports partnership with Opex and Central Athlete.
Languages Supported
English
Chinese
German
Hindi
Japanese
Spanish
French
Russian
Italian
Dutch
Portugese
Polish
Turkish
Swedish
Arabic
Prominent Clients
Daniel Camargo, Revo PT, Matt Reynolds
Available Devices
Windows
Linux
Android
iPhone/iPad
Mac
Web-based
Windows Mobile
Company Size
Small Business
Large Enterprises
Medium Business
Freelancers
Available Support
email
phone
live support
training
tickets
General Info
A personal training platform used by individual coaches, physical therapists, and gym owners to create individualized workout programs, communicate with their clients, and track clients' progress.
All the data, information and statistics that we offered in this comparison were taken from official vendor pages, marketing materials available online, real-life experience from real clients as well as our personal direct use of every solution by an expert. We put a lot of effort to comprehensively examine every product, as a result we not only test it ourselves, but we also correlate our observations with views of other people from the SaaS community.
Page last modified
Why is FinancesOnline free?
FinancesOnline is available for free for all business professionals interested in an efficient way to find top-notch SaaS solutions. We are able to keep our service free of charge thanks to cooperation with some of the vendors, who are willing to pay us for traffic and sales opportunities provided by our website. Please note, that FinancesOnline lists all vendors, we’re not limited only to the ones that pay us, and all software providers have an equal opportunity to get featured in our rankings and comparisons, win awards, gather user reviews, all in our effort to give you reliable advice that will enable you to make well-informed purchase decisions.
